What is the effect of radiation on birds and animals?

Electromagnetic radiation from cell phones and cell towers affects birds, the environment. When birds are exposed to weak electromagnetic fields, they become disoriented and fly in all directions, harming their natural navigational abilities.

Cell phone towers

Cell phone towers cause cancer in the brain. They chase the birds. They should stay away from residential and marketplaces. But the private sector is our boss today. They can do anything. And only for them, the government runs. You and I are just slaves. Jai Hind.

The specific absorption rate of waves by nearby life may need to be investigated. Some believe that they are very dangerous and cause serious conditions such as cancer and impair immunity and cell behavior. 

But, our body is such that it adapts to the circumstances day by day. It had already been associated with several such waves. 

Good quality equipment

If good quality equipment is used then the effect of mobile tower waves may not be so severe as our body and mind are better equipped to deal with such subtle signal waves. However, stay away from them as far as possible.

As others have mentioned, EMR cannot be explicitly identified as safe. The question then becomes the level of exposure which is determined by the proximity, planar alignment, power level and possible effects of the different frequencies. 

(Within the frequency spectrum used by ‘cell phone’ providers, there are a wide range of claims made for the potential effects brought on living organisms by different frequencies, but very few scientifically supported.)

In general, We hope that the zoning requirements and interest in not causing physical harm to the cell phone providers themselves will ‘protect’ us. 

The level of direct regulation or EMR

Despite this, the level of direct regulation, or EMR, from cell phone towers (and other sources) remains fairly low. 

I generally feel safe and to date, I have never seen a valid peer-reviewed epidemiological study that reveals risk. 

This does not mean that all towers have no errors and some specific towers contribute significantly to the risk of poor design, poor installation or poor maintenance. 

The same is true of many risks not only of EMR sources but of anything else. Life is not without risk and eliminating all risks essentially means creating nothing. 

what we face of wireless communication

The demonstrable returns of wireless communications to society seem to easily outweigh any risks.

Remember, we can eliminate many other risks such as automobile-related deaths (both accident and emissions-related illness) by not building freeway cars, but instead, we follow a regulatory regime that counts risks against benefits. 

balances out. This makes sense in every industry that has any potential for harm to users or even people with only a beautiful backyard and close view of a cell tower.

WHO carcinogen classification

There are studies, there is a WHO carcinogen classification, and Sweden has already recognized it as a health hazard. what age do Huskies stop Growing 

You’ll find studies saying there’s no proof of this. And people are saying that microwaves are not harmful because their radiation is non-ionizing. This is tantamount to saying that the boxer’s punch is safe because it does not penetrate the skin.

There are more mechanisms than microwaves that affect our cells and our bodies, many of which we don’t know about or have bothered to investigate.

How do microwaves affect the human body?

It’s safe to admit that we don’t know everything about microwaves and how it affects the human body, which should prompt further research before they can be used by the public. Instead, we hold onto the non-ionization argument and dismiss all possibilities.

If you want to prove to yourself whether your body is negatively or positively affected by microwave radiation. I suggest you buy an RF bed canopy. and sleep in it. And you record how you feel before and after using it.

An RF shielding canopy is basically a Faraday cage, it will keep incoming RF signals and signals within lock-in. So there is no RF source inside. such as cellphones.

You’re going to get a lot of opinions and confusing statistics and numbers. Do it the best and prove it to yourself.

Radiation admit from cell phone towers

As of now, little is known about cell phone towers – the amount of radiation they emit, their proximity to homes, and so on – available in the public domain. A change has been sought in the petition. 

Creating a regulatory body will help citizens to find out data on cell tower installations in their locality, 10 lines about online classes compliance with norms, number of antennas installed in towers and power emitted by them.

The International Agency for Research in Cancer

The International Agency for Research in Cancer classified ‘radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (including radiofrequency electromagnetic fields from wireless phones)’ as a Group 2B carcinogen in May 2011.

This classification includes substances, mixtures, and exposure conditions that are ‘possibly carcinogenic to humans. , Other items included in this classification include DDT,

How are cell towers similar to DDT, a pesticide infamous for its environmental effects? This is a good question. On December 8, about 90 local residents asked this question and many others at an event to explore the health and environmental impacts of wireless technology. 

As new cell towers were being proposed in the area, interest was high, with standing room only at Point Reyes Community Presbyterian Church.

Event about human and environmental health

The event was sponsored by the West Marin Alliance for Human and Environmental Health, the Point Reyes Coalition for Safetech, and the Ecological Choice Network. I spoke with Dr. Madga Havas from Canada and Eli Marks of the California Brain Tumor Association.

I am a physician who has studied and developed policies for environmental toxins for over 25 years. When I learned about a proposal to install a cell tower at my daughter’s school 10 years ago, 

I got into research. What I learned is that wireless technology and infrastructure is pervasive environmental and human toxin. We use and are increasingly surrounded by these devices: cell phones, laptops, “smart” watches, “smart” meters, and Internet routers. 

Unfortunately, we have been told that these devices are safe, that we don’t really know if there is any harm or that the research is inconclusive. I and the more than 250 expert scientists who have looked into the issue draw the opposite conclusion.

The Federal Communications Commission

To start, the standard set by the Federal Communications Commission is based on just one effect: heating of tissues. 

It’s like a cooking standard, and it ignores other biological influences. Nature and human biology are much more complex than technology. 

Humans have evolved over millions of years in an environment with extremely low electromagnetic radiation. Our bodies use very small electrical signals to communicate within a labyrinth of molecules that are vital for the proper development of the fetus and the healthy functioning of an adult.

Fraction of the thousands of dizzying interactions

In medical school, I learned about only a fraction of the thousands of dizzying interactions within and between cells that control reproduction, energy metabolism, the immune system, gut, brain, and nervous system. 

I learned that biology is both complex and delicate, like a symphonic orchestra, in which every instrument must be played perfectly. In studying toxic exposures, 

I learned that there may be different mechanisms at work that damage our cells and biology.

One of these mechanisms is oxidation, which, like rust, causes aging and the breakdown of DNA, proteins, lipids and other important molecules. 

The pesticide DDT causes oxidation, and the antioxidants we use counteract this effect. The effect of oxidation on cells has been well studied; Scientific literature links oxidative cellular damage to inflammation and human disease. This mechanism does not involve heat injury.